Ruth Anderson 50m
I am typing this up on the day that we would have departed for Japan, a combination of business and pleasure, with in the middle the Fuji 5 Lakes ultramarathon where I signed up for the 100km on April 30. The earthquake lead to a cancellation of our plans. So what should I do with hundreds of miles of quality, high speed, flat training ? Well, there were not too many alternatives besides the Ruth Anderson Ultras in San Francisco. So, two days before a couple of my Dutch running buddies would run one of my favorite races in the Netherlands, the 60km of Texel, I laced up my shoes for the Ruth Anderson 50 mile race.
Ruth Anderson 2011 promised to be a good day for runners, cool and some clouds, perhaps a little drizzle and perfect temperatures. It turned out to be just like that, perfect. My training had been designed for a 100 km, but I decided to do the 50 mile (80.45 km) as that distance was where I had my least competitive PR; a 7:29 ran at the JFK. SO, I came with a clear goal in mind. A solid 50 mile PR. According to my stats, I should be able to run 7 hours….
With 4.475 mile loops, I calculated that I should be running 37.5 minute laps to meet my goal. The course offers a bit of climbing, about 150 feet per lap, and it is difficult to keep constant km-splits. So, keeping track of lap times proved to be more useful, and I was able to build up some reserve over the first 5 or 6 laps, accumulating to 5 or 6 minutes. Laps 7 through 10 saw a consolidation of this reserve, and the last lap I gave up a few minutes to make sure I would not blow up my quads. So, I cruised in with a finish time of 6:55:41 for the 50 mile distance (according to my Garmin 81.5 km). Good for second place overall, first in age group, and a couple of blisters and a bum knee. Can't complain about that.
It may all sound a bit dry and scientific as I talk about km and lap splits and goals, but in the middle of it all I had some good conversations with other runners such as Jason, Victor, Sean, and others. The data evaluation afterwards shows that this new 50 mile PR is more competitive than my 50 km, 60 km and 100 km PRs, so perhaps I should plan a few more flat paved loop courses for those distances ??? On the other hand, I think I am ready for a break and do some fun-running in the hills without time goals.
